Start with responsibility and intended use
A factory acceptance test should demonstrate the agreed functions and performance with representative product and packaging before dispatch. The protocol must define the run boundary, samples, measurements, pass criteria, deviations and open actions. Define who supplies, integrates, installs, owns and uses the equipment, and record the final product, packaging, environment, operator tasks and maintenance interventions. A generic certificate or checklist cannot replace that project-specific scope.
Questions for the project team
- Which approved product and pack combinations represent the difficult limits?
- How long must the line run and how is sustained output calculated?
- Which fill, closure, label, code, reject and safety results are measured?
- What evidence, deviations, retests and outstanding site work are recorded?
Documents and evidence to plan
The exact records depend on the project, but the following deliverables provide a practical starting structure:
- approved FAT protocol
- sample and material schedule
- calibrated measurement equipment list
- results, settings, deviations and evidence
- agreed open-points and site-acceptance plan
Apply the controls across the machinery lifecycle
Review the requirement during specification, supplier selection, design review, factory testing, installation, site acceptance, training, routine operation, cleaning, maintenance and modification. A change that appears small—such as a new solvent, bottle size, cap, guarding opening, extraction system or line speed—can alter the original risk or conformity basis.
Current official sources
Use the official sources below as the starting point and check their update dates when the project is reviewed.
Common questions
What is the starting point for factory acceptance testing for packaging machinery?
A factory acceptance test should demonstrate the agreed functions and performance with representative product and packaging before dispatch. The protocol must define the run boundary, samples, measurements, pass criteria, deviations and open actions.
Does a conformity mark replace the user risk assessment?
No. Supply obligations and duties for safe installation, use, inspection, maintenance and workplace risk control are related but distinct.
Who should confirm the legal interpretation?
Use current official guidance and competent legal, safety, engineering, metrology or food-safety advice appropriate to the project and jurisdiction.
When should the assessment be reviewed?
Review it when equipment, product, packaging, formulation, process, controls, room layout, use or official requirements change, and after relevant incidents or findings.